From 92f95f219d8023b52035fc804fa62bbdebab0b5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eyuep Sueyruege Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 12:25:25 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add docs/research_Video.md --- docs/research_Video.md | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/research_Video.md diff --git a/docs/research_Video.md b/docs/research_Video.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5bb7e69 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/research_Video.md @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +### Video Recognition + +#### Costs +- Developing and implementing a video recognition system can incur significant expenses, including hardware, software development, and ongoing maintenance costs. + +#### Limited Applicability +- Video recognition may not be suitable for all types of games, although for a specific card deck, this limitation may not be significant. + +#### Technical Challenges +- Implementing video recognition and voice output can be technically demanding and may require advanced hardware and software. +- Card recognition and real-time processing pose significant challenges. + +#### Technical Problems +- Card Recognition Accuracy: Identifying cards accurately from a video feed can be challenging due to various factors such as lighting conditions and card orientation. +- Real-Time Processing: Achieving real-time processing for effective gaming experience can be technically demanding. +- Hardware Requirements: Real-time video recognition may necessitate powerful hardware components. +- Environmental Factors: Changes in lighting conditions and other environmental factors can affect the accuracy of video recognition. +- User Interface and Interaction: Developing an intuitive user interface for blind individuals presents challenges. + +#### Comparison to NFC/RFID System +- Video recognition requires less equipment and no physical modifications. +- NFC/RFID systems offer faster, more reliable, and consistent performance. +- NFC/RFID systems avoid some difficulties associated with video recognition, such as environmental factors. +- Video recognition can be adapted to a broader range of games without altering physical components. + +#### Comparison to Snapshot VR +- Video recognition provides real-time feedback and continuous monitoring. +- Snapshot VR offers reduced processing load and simpler debugging. +- Snapshot VR may experience delays in providing information and may miss game changes between snapshots. + +#### System Overview +1. **Camera**: A camera captures the game. +2. **Computer**: Connected to the camera, processes the video feed. +3. **Software**: Special software recognizes the cards and communicates with users. +4. **Website**: Displays game information for blind users. +5. **Voice or Sound**: Provides auditory feedback to players. +6. **Internet**: Facilitates gameplay with distant friends. + +#### Development Timeline +- Planning and research: 1-2 weeks +- Hardware and software acquisition: 2-4 weeks +- Development: 6-12 months +- Testing and optimization: 2-3 months +- UI design: 1-2 months +- Integration: 2-4 weeks +- User training and support: 1-2 months +- Deployment and initial testing: 2-4 weeks +- User feedback and adjustment: ongoing + +#### Accelerating Development +- Narrowing project scope +- Utilizing pre-existing solutions +- Rapid prototyping +- Seeking expert assistance +- Choosing readily available and well-documented hardware and software +- Involving impaired users in the development process for feedback and understanding +